Archive for September, 2007

Protesters Demand Return of Marshall Field’s

“The point is to protest a brutal and stupid takeover of a crowned jewel of Chicago. … They’ve turned it into a Wal-Mart,” said Tom O’Brien, a 51-year-old writer.

O’Brien said Sunday’s protest of Macy’s takeover was his third.

“(Macy’s) sales are down, their stock prices are down,” he said. “People aren’t giving up on this.”

March organizer Jim McKay, a 44-year-old adjunct professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said the goal is bring Marshall Field’s back someday. It’s ambitious, he said, but attainable.

“Macy’s is a run of the mill, template, ubiquitous kind of store. It’s not the same quality as Marshall Field’s,” McKay said between shouts into a megaphone.

More here.

UK Shopping Center Cracks Down on 4-Year Old

hoodie_girl

In her pink cardigan and standing a mere 3ft6in, fouryearold Karen Lewis hardly looks a menace to society.

But that didn’t stop staff at a seaside amusement arcade reducing the little girl to tears by warning her she was flouting company rules on hooded tops.

A worker explained to Karen’s mother, Cheryl, that it was company policy to insist customers pulled down their hoods, in case yobs used them to conceal their identity while causing trouble.

The incident took place while Karen was playing on a 2p slot machine at Les Harker’s Amusements in the North Wales resort of Rhyl, where she was on holiday with her mother and grandparents.

Miss Lewis, 36, a mature student from Shrewsbury, said: “I appreciate there is bad publicity about hoodies, but a four-year-old girl is an entirely different issue.

More here.

(Spotted at Aftermath News)

Reason: The Limits of Anti-Kelo Legislation

Reason magazine has up a in-depth look at the sorts of legislation states are putting into practice to limit eminent domain and how effective (or ineffective) such legislation is.

Nearly every state legislature has either adopted or considered legislation to curb the use of eminent domain since Kelo, but only 14 have enacted laws that provide significantly increased protections for property rights. Several other states have enacted effective reforms by popular referendum. Seventeen state legislatures have passed laws that purport to restrict eminent domain, but in reality accomplish very little.

Legislators have found many different ways to produce bills that appear to protect property rights without actually doing so. Texas, for example, banned “economic development” takings but continues to permit them under other names, such as “community development.” The most common tactic, used in some 16 states’ post-Kelo laws, is to allow economic development condemnations to continue under the guise of alleviating “blight.” While it may sometimes be desirable to use eminent domain to transform severely dilapidated areas, many states define “blight” so broadly that almost any neighborhood qualifies. A 2003 Nevada Supreme Court decision concluded that downtown Las Vegas was blighted, thus allowing the authorities to condemn some property that local casinos coveted for a new parking lot. A 2001 New York appellate decision held that Times Square was blighted, paving the way for the condemnation of property to build a new headquarters for The New York Times.

Commenting on the Credit Pullback

CoStar Group has a long article up surveying many retail real estate companies and how their execs say they are being impacted by the credit pullback.

Companies chiming in on the subject include Woolbright Development, Phillips Edison, Pine Tree Institutional Realty, SCI Real Estate Investments, Cole Companies, Dividend Capital Realty Trust, WBS Properties and Weingarten Realty Investors.

CoStar says that more companies will be added throughout the course of the day.

Here’s one excerpt:

According to Michael Phillips, principal of Phillips Edison, the lack of credit in the residential market is having an effect on the cost of debt in the commercial market. “It’s eliminating some of the higher leveraged buyers that have been in the market for the last few years,” said Phillips, adding that this is a primary reason why he believes companies like his with strong balance sheets, good cash and strong history will excel in this real estate cycle.

“The rise in interest rates has made retail property margins very thin. Buyers have receded and are not as active in the market as they have been in the past.” Further, he agreed that the average price-per-square-foot will probably show a decline over the next two quarters, but identified the Western states, due to their continued high growth, as more resilient than the rest of the country.

Phillips also talks about its recent transaction with Developers Diversified Realty, which Retail Traffic covered in this story.

Rising Cost of Capital’s Effect on REITs

ReitTrends.com has a commentary up on the effect of the rising cost of capital on REITs.

Case in point: Cost of capital. Many REITs that have nothing to do with sub-prime lending went down recently in sympathy with the mortgage REITs. You had a higher than anticipated default rate, then a credit squeeze, then downgrades, then equity downgrades, then another rush for the exits, then a repricing of risk, then another credit crunch, a couple of hedge funds busted, a couple more got rescued…exciting headlines, lots of fun for the talking heads, but nothing to do with my Shopping Center REIT or Industrial Property REIT, right?

Wrong.

Remember, stock and bond markets are CAPITAL MARKETS. You and I use them toward their secondary purpose…we buy and sell securities from other buyers and sellers in a secondary market. Primarily, though, capital markets are how firms raise capital. Especially important for REITs.

Real Estate Funds Bounce Back

After an absence of several months, real estate funds moved back into August’s penthouse. With a 4.46% gain on average, they reclaimed the top spot among sectors, according to Lipper.

It was their first top finish since January. It ended a three-month skid in last place.

Among all sectors, real estate was hurt the least by latest fallout from the subprime lending meltdown and credit crunch. It had already had a meltdown of its own, having skidded 11.21% the past three months to be down 7.48% for the year. That’s the worst among sectors.

Investors figured out that most real estate funds’ holdings weren’t hurt in August by the residential mortgage-oriented crisis, said Richard Imperiale, manager of the $51million Forward Progressive Real Estate Fund FFREX.

More here.

Creating a Place With Public Services

Buxton’s Retail Economic Development Blog has a little commentary up on how public services can be integral to making successful mixed-use and multi-use projects.

All too often, however, these developments focus on non-retail facilities that are commercial in nature such as hotels, theme parks, luxury housing, outpatient surgery centers, multi-screen theaters, auto malls and fitness centers.
While these commercial-type businesses and services are great to include in a retail development, there are many public-sector services that also should be part of the plan. This is where city leaders need to step in and consider which public services could and should be included in the development, including, perhaps, a new city hall, school district offices, a public plaza, a city-funded daycare center, a convention center, a library or jogging trails.

Drugstore Wars

Retailer Blog has a short but informative post on the brewing drugstore wars.

Wal-Mart fired the first shot when announcing last year it was going to sell more than 100 different generic drugs for just $4 a prescription. They were soon followed by Target, Publix Supermarkets, and others. Recently the folks at Publix decided to go even further down this path by offering to fill prescriptions for seven popular antibiotics free. While $4 prescriptions are quite an incentive to take your business to a particular store, I don’t know of a more compelling incentive than FREE!

Read the rest here.

Construction Spending Drops, But Not on Commercial

On Tuesday, the Commerce Department reported July construction stats, which showed the biggest drop in six months.

However, that drop was on the residential side. On the non-residential side, construction actually increased.

In other economic news Tuesday, the Institute for Supply Management said that its closely followed gauge of manufacturing activity rose at a slower pace in August compared to July. The index was up 52.9 in August compared to a reading of 53.8 in July.

The construction report showed that the weakness in housing was offset somewhat by strength in nonresidential building which rose by 0.4 percent in July to an all-time high of $346 billion at an annual rate. Construction of shopping centers, office buildings and hotels all showed increases.

Predicting a Pricing Downfall

It’s time to play catch-up on some of this week’s interesting stories.

David Stejkowski linked and commented on a Bloomberg story that predicted a 10 percent to 15 percent drop in commercial real estate prices.

It echoes a lot of what we’ve been hearing lately. After years of record-setting volumes, the pace of deals is slowing. Cap rates are rising primarily on lower-quality assets. All this is happening despite fundamentals remaining strong across the board. And a lot of this is being driven by the debt markets. A new, higher cost of borrowing is being reflected in the hesitancy of buyers to pay the same prices they were paying last year (or even a few months ago).

But is this Armageddon for commercial real estate?

Here is a choice section from the Bloomberg piece:

“People aren’t willing to do deals right now,” said Howard Michaels, the New York-based chairman of Carlton Advisory Services Inc., which has arranged financing for real estate purchases including the Lipstick Building in midtown Manhattan. “The expectation is that prices will come down.”

Investors in July bought the fewest commercial properties since August 2006 and apartment building acquisitions were down 50 percent from June, data compiled by industry consultants at New York-based Real Capital Analytics Inc. show. Archstone-Smith Trust in August postponed its $13.5 billion sale to a group led by Tishman Speyer Properties LP until October. Mission West Properties Inc., the owner of commercial buildings in Silicon Valley, said on Aug. 13 that the company’s $1.8 billion sale may fail after a bank withdrew funding.

“There are so many deals falling apart,” said David Lichtenstein, chief executive officer of Lakewood, New Jersey- based Lightstone Group, an owner of more than 20,000 apartments and 30 million square feet of office and retail space. “People who can get out are getting out.”

That makes things sound extremely dire. David Stejkowski has a more tempered view of the whole thing, which makes a lot of sense. Here’s what he had to say:

What do I think will happen? There will be deals, even though some sellers will not want to sell, if for no other reason out of necessity or from banks who take back properties, etc. There are always deals to be had for one reason or another, albeit not at the insane breakneck pace we’ve seen. Smart investors will buy at the right price, finance with traditional loans for the time being and take a hit with higher short term borrowing costs, waiting for rates to decline before refinancing into the most restrictive (but lower-cost) CMBS market. There will probably be fewer portfolio deals and more single-asset transactions. And we can all start acting normally again. And the sky, while at least partly cloudy, will not have fallen.