TrafficCourt
Industry news, views and occasional strange stuff.
Contributor
Search This Blog
Categories
Advertisement
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
Calendar
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Your Account
Pages
Blogroll
- BIGMallrat
- BNET: Retail
- Business Insider
- Deal Junkie
- DealBook
- Duke Long’s Agent Genius blog
- Face2Face Meetingsnet
- Georgia Retail Memories
- Groceteria
- Hard Hat Chat
- Keypoint Partners Retail Roundup
- Labelscar
- Llenrock Blog
- LoopNet Blog
- Mall Hall of Fame
- NAI Global Blog
- National Real Estate Investor
- Net Gain Real Estate
- Peter Pays Paul
- Places Magazine Blog
- Pleasant Family Shopping
- Property Jump
- Real Property Alpha
- Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space
- REIT Wrecks
- Retail Marketing 411
- Retail News Blog
- Retail Traffic Magazine
- RetailChatr
- Retailer Blog
- RetailREBiz.com
- Square Feet Blog
- Square Footage
- StreetWise
- Supermarket News
- Tampa Commercial Real Estate
- That Mall’s Sick And That Store’s Dead!
- The CRE Review
- The Dirt Lawyer’s Blog
- The Front Desk
- The Ground Floor
- The Real Estate Bloggers
- The ShiSh List
- The Specialty Retail Expert
Find Us on the Web


GGP Wins Court Approval of Brookfield Bid; Simon Withdraws
by David Bodamer May 7th, 2010
Updated at 4:13
It looks like General Growth Properties will remain independent. A bankruptcy court today approved a Brookfield Asset Management-led recapitalization plan for the second largest operator of regional malls in the U.S. Almost immediately after that hearing was announced, Simon issued a press release saying it has withdrawn both its acquisition and recapitalization offers.
Update: The Wall Street Journal’s recap of the hearing provides a few more details. Importantly, it notes that Simon is not prevented from continuing to make bids for General Growth. But all indications seem to be that Simon will drop its pursuit of General Growth.
Text of Simon’s release after the jump.
Simon Property Group Withdraws Acquisition and Recapitalization Proposals for General Growth Properties
SPG Will Not Participate in Bidding Process in GGP Bankruptcy
INDIANAPOLIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Simon Property Group, Inc. (NYSE: SPG) (“SPG”) today announced that it has withdrawn its fully financed acquisition and recapitalization proposals for General Growth Properties, Inc. (NYSE: GGP) (“GGP”).
David Simon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, said, “GGP’s decision to move forward with the latest Brookfield-sponsored change of control recapitalization, without giving due consideration to SPG’s proposals, is a truly unfortunate result for all GGP stakeholders. The transaction approved today values GGP at a minimum of $5.00 less per share than SPG’s $20.00 per share offer, when accounting for the highly expensive and dilutive warrants to be issued to the Brookfield consortium.”
Simon continued: “We are disappointed that the GGP board hastily decided in less than 24 hours to accept substantially less value, rather than take more time to fully assess the benefits of SPG’s offer and enter into negotiations to make this value available to GGP shareholders. In addition, SPG’s recapitalization proposal offered the certainty GGP desired along with an $11.00 per share value, which is also substantially higher than what GGP shareholders will receive under the plan approved today, after taking the highly expensive and dilutive warrants into account.”
Simon added: “For many months, SPG has tried to work collaboratively and productively with GGP to bring our proposals to fruition. SPG has been highly flexible, making numerous changes to its proposals in response to requests from GGP, its stakeholders and its advisors. GGP’s decision to proceed with a transaction that transfers hundreds of millions of dollars in value to the Brookfield consortium has caused us to conclude that we cannot reach a mutually beneficial transaction with GGP. As a result, it is in SPG’s best interests to withdraw our proposals and decline to participate in the bidding process in the GGP bankruptcy.”
Simon concluded, “I am confident in our ability to grow the business as we have done historically. We will continue to focus on our business and evaluate other opportunities in the marketplace as we always have: prudently, in a disciplined manner, and in the best interests of our shareholders.”
Related Topics: Commentary, Finance, Investment, Management & Leasing, News, REITs, Retail Real Estate |