David Simon, chairman & CEO, is presenting for Simon Property Group at NAREIT’s REIT Week.
Refresh page for updates.
Below are notes from the session:
3:02: Simon: Fundamentals in the business are pretty good. We just came back from several meetings with retailers, including the ICSC. General demand is picking up. Our first quarter results were excellent. … Our revenues increased 10.2 percent. Our spreads were up and our comparable property NOI was up more than 2 percent. Fundamentals are decent and getting better. There is still a lot of workout work to do. Retailers are still cautious, but feeling more comfortable in opening stores. … Our balance sheet is generally in great shape and I think things are headed in the right direction.
3:04 Simon: We expect to send $2 billion to $3 billion on the existing portfolio—redeveloping, expanding, modernizing and adding … amenities. … We started that a year-plus ago. Some of our peers are talking about starting that now, but we’re already well into that process. … Generally we still think we have a lot of upside in our leases, especially in our outlet portfolio. Including Mills and properties in construction, we have 99 dedicated to value-oriented retail. That’s a pretty good spot to be.
3:05: What are we going to do to grow? Show me in the retail real estate world who is growing more than us? … This year first quarter was 14.2 percent FFO per share growth. This year I expect to have record earnings for the company. … Most people have growth, but are not going to get back to record earnings. They may grow off ’10 or ’09, but are still off their peek. … We will have the highest FFO in our company history.
3:07: (In response to question about redevelopment and potential of mixed-use.) Simon: There are unique asset intensifications available to us. For instance, Copley Place in Boston is a unique opportunity to add some retail square footage, but also potentially a residential tower. There are going to be some residential and hotel opportunities in our portfolio as we intensify the use. But I agree that the vast majority will be to further reposition assets from a retail perspective.
3:10: (In response to question about Calloway JV.) Simon: We are excited about the Canadian opportunity. I think we are off to a good start. Hopefully we can get a commitment from an anchor that is very interesting. … A lot of the very successful outlets are in the Northern part of the U.S. So it’s not as if Canadians don’t understand it. … I think if you can end up building 15, it’s a pretty good size. It would be a good build-out considering what’s out there now.
3:13: Simon: Almost every retailer goes through the evolution of store sizes. They start small, go a little bigger, biggest, then head back in the other direction. … That’s a natural evolution. What we have to do is keep the center fresh, looking great, driving customer traffic and look to see that they don’t reach for too much space.
3:16: Simon: Where we envision being able to communicate to our customer is that they know they’re in a Simon mall. We want to communicate with them and we’ll give our best retailers the ability to communicate with them. … We’re going to try and do it in a coordinated fashion where they have the best that we have to offer and the best the retailers have to offer. We want to treat our best customers specially. … We’ve never done that. But we want to treat our best mall customers better than just any other guy that shows up.
3:24: Simon: (On question about Internet sales taxation.) We need federal legislation to change what we consider one of the most unfair taxation situations. Pure Internet retailers do not have to collect sales tax. But Gap has to collect sales tax on online sales, even in the same states. … It’s not a new tax. It’s just a tax that the online guys ignore and do not collect. … We are hoping that logic prevails and it levels the playing field and leave it up to the states to decide what to do. … We need Congress to act. … It’s not an ideological issue. It’s going to take an act of Congress and I’m going to work my tail off to make it happen. … There’s no reason to treat a mom & pop shop different from an Amazon. … Why does Amazon get the benefit over the mom & pop?
3:30: Simon: (In response to a question about new concepts and weaker players.) The weaker retailers evolve. Some get better. Some get worse. There always seem to be a new class of retailers to take up the slack. … Some are going through tough times. At the same time, we’re seeing some others take the market share. … Let’s face it, there is a lot of retail real estate. There will be some obsolescence. … That obsolescence now comes pretty quick. I think long run, it is good, let’s clean out the excess capacity and get to where we need to be.
End of session.


NAREIT REIT Week Live Blog: Pennsylvania REIT
by David Bodamer June 7th, 2011
Edward Glickman, president & COO and Robert F. McCadden, executive vice president and CFO, are presenting for Pennsylvania REIT at NAREIT’s REIT Week.
Refresh page for updates.
Below are notes from the session:
3:48: Glickman: The company continues on plan. … Expecting year-end occupancy in the high 80s. Same-store NOI growth plus-or-minus 1.0 percent. … On the capital side, on the last five years decade the company spent more than $1 billion in repositioning. Much of this was financed by debt. … We found ourselves in an overlevered position. Since early 2010 the company has taken a number of steps to repair the balance sheet. … Our intermediate goal is to bring the debt-to-gross-asset-value ratio down to about 60 percent.
3:50: McCadden: For the balance of ‘11 and into ‘12, we have a large number of expirations due to doing short-term leases in the 2008-2009 period. We have 60 percent near-term expirations at malls doing less than $350 per square foot. … We’ve made an upward movement in overall portfolio occupancy and stabilized occupancy at these lower-sales assets. … There is interest from retailers to open locations in some of those lower assets, but mostly looking at 2012. … We see flattish renewal spreads in short term and sustained growth beyond that.
3:52: Glickman: One example is parent of Kay Jewelers, which has many stores with PREIT and they are looking for additional stores with the company. I use that as an example because jewelry was hurt deeply during the recession and has now staged a comeback. … The mall is a place where jewelers can do well, even if sales for the property are below the national average. … It’s a good use for malls and one we see expanding. … ICSC was interesting because after two years of pretty negative comments from retailers about their outlook, at this ICSC we saw a shift in momentum and the dialogue in past years was about protecting profits and cutting back and how to survive the recession. Now it’s all about how to get growth.
3:55: McCadden: (In response to question about turning short-term leases into long-term ones.) At end of Q1 at $357 per square foot. … As of the end of December and into first quarter, we have a fair amount of tenants in holdover. … We are keeping tenants on in month-to-month basis. … In many cases, our view is that we are negotiating for renewal terms that are more commensurate with an improving economy than one that is in a downward cycle. … We would hope we could grab part of that uplift in renewal spreads in the latter part of 2011 and into 2012.
3:56: McCadden: (In breaking down the sales recovery at its malls.) You saw a lot more volatility at the higher end—steeper decreases and now greater improvements. Below $350 per square foot, they didn’t fall as much and haven’t risen as much. … Most of the volatility has been on the upper end of the portfolio.
4:01: Glickman: There have been two major portfolios that have been on the market—one by Westfield and one by GGP. PREIT has looked at a distance at both of those portfolios. We are not an immediate candidate for either portfolio, there might be assets in one or both portfolios that might be attractive to the company. … We’re more focused on organic growth and improving NOI. … The positive fact of having these portfolios trading is that it will set a benchmark and will (help improve the financing market for B and C malls)…. The more trading in these assets, the more vibrant the market is, the better it is for the company. Our thinking is that it will start help revaluing other assets and help in two ways—valuation and help us in trading assets out of our portfolio.
4:11: Glickman: The highest-concentration of sales-per-square-foot would be Apple, which is probably without peer. It might be a multiple of 30X its next competitor. Beyond that it might be jewelers, who can get (a lot out of small spaces). … We mix all sorts of products to have a merchandise mix that will make a productive, efficient, but utilitarian shopping experience. … People want to experience shopping, have a good time, but get what they need done. So we provide a panoply of services. … In many properties we are expanding to a Town Center concept to add uses that are not traditional retail. … We view it as the future of the business in all but the rarified atmosphere of the highest-productivity malls. … We view mixed-use as a future direction for some of our projects. … We’ve already put into some of our properties—and intend to do more—health care (i.e. places to get well care, not acute care) as well as wellness related things like fitness centers. Beyond that we’re talking about county or community services where you can pay a bill. … Community colleges are becoming important, so they’re looking for additional space. Think about taking an old theater and turning it into community college space. It has lecture halls and our food court becomes their dining hall.
End of session
No Comments Related Topics: Commentary, Conference Coverage, Development, Finance, Investment, Management & Leasing, News, REITs, Retail Real Estate |