Archive for the ‘Trends’ Category

FCIC on CRE: “You’ve Got to Get Up and Dance.”

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission’s report is out.

There are a couple sections specifically about commercial real estate. The first is, “LEVERAGED LOANS AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE: ‘YOU’VE GOT TO GET UP AND DANCE’” and the second is “COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE: ‘NOTHING’S MOVING’”

The first section documents the explosive rise of the CMBS industry and how that coincided with spikes in property values. The second section from later in the document is about the standstill that eventually emerged in the commercial real estate investment sales market after the financial crisis.

I’ve cut and pasted those two sections after the jump: Read the rest of this entry »

RioCan Continues Aggressive JV Push (Tuesday’s News & Notes)

Canadian real estate giant RioCan REIT has been extremely active in building up its exposure in the United States. Last year it formed joint ventures with Inland Western Retail Real Estate Inc. and Cedar Shopping Centers Inc. Both of those JVs remain active in acquiring assets.

Now RioCan has hooked up with a third U.S. REIT–Tanger Outlet Centers. Only with this venture, RioCan is seeking to bring Tanger’s expertise up north. The $1 billion joint venture to develop outlet malls in Canada.

“In response to the increasing demand by U.S. tenants to expand into Canada, RioCan is pleased to partner with Tanger to develop Canada’s first portfolio of U.S.-style outlet centres,” Edward Sonshine, RioCan’s president and chief executive said in a statement.

“This venture will fill a void in the Canadian retail marketplace and will provide consumers with a distinctive outlet shopping experience closer to home,” he said.

The agreement will see RioCan and Tanger acquire and lease sites across Canada and redevelop them into discount shopping malls in the image of Tanger Outlet Centers in the United States, which cater to brand-name and designer manufacturers.

Here are some other recent news and notes from around the retail real estate world.

Architecture Billings Index Hits Highest Point Since 2007

ABIDec2010

Here’s another sign that the outlook for commercial real estate is continuing to slowly improve: The AIA’s Architectural Billings Index hit its highest point since 2007. The graph is from Calculated Risk.

“On the heels of its highest mark since 2007, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) jumped more than two points in December. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the December ABI score was 54.2, up from a reading of 52.0 the previous month. This score reflects an increase in demand for design services (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings). The new projects inquiry index was 62.6, up slightly from a mark of 61.4 in November.”

“This is more promising news that the design and construction industry is continuing to move toward a recovery,” said AIA Chief Economist, Kermit Baker, PhD, Hon. AIA. However, historically December is the most unpredictable month from a business standpoint, and therefore the most difficult month from which to interpret a trend. The coming quarter will give us a much better sense of the strength of the apparent upturn in design activity.”

MP: The New Project Inquiries Index is at the highest level since July 2007 and the Billings Index is the highest level since November 2007, so both indexes are now above their pre-recession levels.

The Best Chains on Main

chain logo med_1

Recently, I had the opportunity to serve as one of the judges for first annual ‘Best Chain on Main’ competition put together by The Commercial District Advisor (CDA) and the Local Initiative Support Corporation. The awards recognizes regional and national chain stores that pave the way for commercial revitalization. Winners were chosen based on their investment in underserved urban markets, ability to provide excellent service, maintain clean and attractive stores, storefronts and merchandise displays, and their contribution to local commercial revitalization efforts.

Today, the winners of that competition were announced..

Below you’ll find brief blurbs from CDA’s Larisa Ortiz P-Folkes about each of the five retailers honored. And in the coming weeks we’ll have an expanded slideshow at Retail Traffic in our galleries section and brief interviews with the winners on our Web site.

Read the rest of this entry »

December Sales Miss the Mark, but Overall Holiday Season is Strongest Since 2006

Things cooled down a bit in December after a torrid start in November, but the numbers for the two-month period still make for the best holiday shopping season since 2006.

Same-store rose by just more than 3.0 percent year-over-year–below expectations that same-store sales could rise by about 3.5 percent for the month. The number was slightly higher than last year’s gain of about 2.9 percent. Overall, same-store sales for November and December combined rose by about 4.0 percent, the best year-over-year growth since 2006.

Many retailers actually missed analysts’ expectations for the month, which had been heightened after November’s gaudy numbers.

There was a suspicion that November numbers were partially driven by consumers conducting some or all of their holiday shopping earlier than usual. There was the usual Black Friday madness, but many retailers started promotions and discounting even before that. As a result, November possibly accounted for a larger share of the overall holiday shopping season than what we’ve become accustomed to. The strong month may very well have been a sign that consumption patterns were shifting, not necessarily that consumers were going to spend as robustly for the entire season.

In addition, the blizzard in the Northeast may have taken a bite out of after-Christmas sales. If that’s the case, we should see some evidence of those delayed sales in the January figures.

Going forward, expectations are that retail sales will continue to be choppy. Shoppers may have gone out for the holidays, but the high unemployment rate and other factors mean that consumers remain challenged.

My look inside the monthly reports is after the jump. Read the rest of this entry »

Post Holiday Sales Jockeying Begins (Monday’s News & Notes)

Because of the holidays and the crippling blizzard last week, there’s not a ton to catch up on in the retail real estate world. The period between Christmas and this past weekend was a quiet one for the industry.

However, now that the holidays are over, things are starting to come back to life. That means the post-holiday shopping season shakeout is beginning. We’ll find out the real winners and losers and how that affects their futures.

On that front, the situation with Borders is continuing to
evolve. The bookseller had a tough holiday shopping season and now bankruptcy may be in the cards.

Per Daily Finance:

Borders has been telling some of its key vendors — including some of the largest publishing houses — that it’s delaying year-end 2010 payments for inventory. One of those houses is Hachette Book Group (LGDDY), whose CEO David Young told the The Wall Street Journal that Borders has indeed delayed its most recent payment to the publisher, adding that Hachette “will decide shortly whether to continue shipping new books to Borders.”

In addition, readers of The Street see Office Depot as a likely takeover target in 2011. TheStreet also identified 17 possible retail M&A deals we may see this year.

Here are some other news and notes from around the industry.

At Mall of America, Something to Tweet About

PROMO editor at large Brian Quinton had some interesting observations this morning about Mall of America’s Twitter strategy.

I’ve re-posted his thoughts below:

Like most everyone in this nation, I’ve spent a large chunk of the last four weeks wandering around a shopping mall, first selecting thoughtful gifts for my loved ones and then tromping back to exchange the rubbish I got in exchange. (Kudos to you, Amazon.com, and your reported patent to introduce a stealth “gift blocker” to block that home cheese-making kit from Aunt Hilda.)

In between retail encounters—and the occasional soft pretzel—I took time to put my mobile phone through some new tricks this year. I checked in to location-based networks like Foursquare every few paces, just to see what deals were being offered. I turned on all my smartphone shopping apps to make sure coupons and rebates were pushed to my phone without any help from me. I scanned barcodes with impunity, sometimes for video content on my phone, and sometimes to find better prices online for items I was looking at in-store. (And I found them, too.)

All in all, if we’re not all more connected to brands after this holiday season, it won’t be because the retailers, mall operators and sell-through manufacturers of America weren’t trying to engage us with promotions in social and mobile.

But I need to testify to what struck me as the most innovative use of social media by a retail entity in December 2010: the Mall of America’s “Big Secret Parking Party” that gave away reserved parking spaces at the nation’s largest enclosed mall on December 18, the busiest shopping day of the year.

On that day, the Minneapolis-area mall closed off a portion of its north parking lot and reserved a precious 96 VIP spaces for its followers on Twitter. Those followers also had to register at social commerce company Eventbrite.com under the #bspp hashtag.

The VIP passes were offered in three batches on Eventbrite Dec. 15 and 16 (along with a surprise batch on Dec. 17). Once they won their BSPP ticket, registrants could show up at the Mall between 8 and 10 a.m. on Saturday Dec. 18, show their Eventbrite registration, and claim their spot.

The Mall of America reportedly has 12,550 spaces in its parking lots and got 195,000 visitors on Black Friday. So you do the math on whether a shot at a free spot would have appeal.

MOA also offered gift cards worth $25 to the first five people to check in on Foursquare each day between December 20 and 23. And the MOA Youth Foundation made a $1 charitable donation for each Facebook Places check-in from December 20 through December 23.

Speaking before the promotion, EVP of operations David Haselman said the Mall of America wanted “to reward loyal Twitter followers with something extremely coveted during the holiday shopping season—a close parking spot with the hassle of a time-consuming search.”

Did this campaign build sales or conversions? Probably not. But malls tend to face a problem when it comes to engendering shopper loyalty; consumers are more liable to pledge their allegiance to specific retail brands than to the mall operators themselves.

But the @MallofAmerica account went from 4,900 followers before the promotion to 6,200 at press time. Not a bad result for a campaign that basically cost nothing, garnered a good deal of regional press, and achieved a 26% increase in followers. And gave shoppers a reason to think about the parcking lot with something other than complete dread.

Holiday Sales Might Be Strongest Since 2007

Here’s a pleasant thought to take with you into 2011–in spite of sluggish pace of economic growth, Americans’ penchant for shopping is back and in robust health. The New York Times reports that, according to preliminary figures, retail spending rose 5.5 percent in the months leading up to Christmas, representing the highest increase since 2007. National Retail Federation forecasts that total holiday sales will reach $451.5 billion in 2010, outpacing the past three years. Back in October, NRF was projecting total holiday sales of $447.1 billion.

Even this week’s massive blizzard might not put much of a dent into retailers’ holiday sales. Though the snow has stopped many shoppers from visiting the mall on what is one of the more critical days of the season, analysts expect it will only serve to extend holiday shopping into January.

Where Are CRE Values?

Corrected at 6:46 PM
Update 1 on Dec. 22, 9:18 AM
Update 2 on Dec. 22, 2:43 PM

Click for full-size image.

Click for full-size image.

Indexes designed to gauge commercial real estate values have been around for a few years now. The original intention was that creators of various indexes were competing to create the benchmarks around which commercial real estate derivatives could be created. Pros had a vision that it would give investors an alternative to buying and selling actual real estate and REIT stocks in playing in the commercial real estate space.

The 2008 financial collapse and the subsequent leeriness about derivatives pretty much killed that idea (at least for now), but the desire to design the best commercial real estate index remained. The original players in the market were Standard & Poors, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and Global Real Analytics; Real Capital Analytics and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Real Estate; and the Rexx Real Estate Property Index, which includes backing from Cushman & Wakefield and Newmark Knight Frank.

But the landscape has changed. Today, the first and third ventures are is now defunct. Correction: The Rexx index still exists. It has been renamed the REBOR Index.

Moody’s now works with MIT and Real Capital and that index has become a popular reference point. In addition, Green Street Advisors and CoStar have entered the fray and begun producing their own indexes.

The question: Which one of these is the best? Moody’s, as the most established, continues to get the most exposure. But the other indexes are getting mentioned more often and both CoStar and Green Street claim there are key differences in how they’re measuring prices compared with the Moody’s/RCA index. Bloomberg’s monthly report on prices now often cites all three.

What’s often lacking, however, is a look at how the three compare.

According to Green Street, “Green Street Advisors’ Commercial Property Price Index (GSA CPPI) is a real-time series of unleveraged U.S. commercial property values. The key feature differentiating this index from others is its timeliness. The GSA CPPI captures the prices at which commercial real estate transactions are currently being negotiated and put under contract.” Meanwhile, CoStar says its numbers are different from Moody’s because “Moody’s pricing index uses the data that DOES NOT include sales under $2.5M. CoStar Group’s monthly index is the only repeat sales index that covers sales transactions from $100,000 and above. And Moody’s chooses deals by a sale price while CoStar uses property class, size etc. so the two indexes won’t have the exact same deals in the datasets.”

Update 1: Chris Macke, senior real estate strategist for CoStar got in contact with us and provided some more information on what distinguishes the indexes.

He wrote:

The primary difference between our index and Moody’s index is the source of data. We use our own sales transaction data while Moody’s uses sales data from a third party. This not only means our underlying sales database is different but because we use our own data we report monthly results on average 2-3 weeks before Moody’s. Moody’s just reported their results for October transactions while we reported October commercial real estate pricing activity about two weeks ago on CNBC.

Regarding the Green Street index, it is not a pricing index. It does not measure prices of commercial real estate. It is Green Street’s estimate of value.

All three indices have their place and value. What is critical is that the market understands the material differences between them.

Update 2: David Geltner, professor of real estate fnance at the MIT Department of Urban Studies & Planning and author of the Professor’s Corner commentaries on the Moody’s/REAL index, also contacted me with some further comments.

Here is what he wrote:

The commercial real estate market in the U.S. these days is a rather complicated animal, or rather, animals (plural). We have been using the RCA repeat-sales database that underlies the Moody’s/REAL CPPI to track pricing in three separate market segments that have opened up and grown apart during 2010: “Trophy” properties, “Distressed” properties, and, well, everything else (”Other”). Trophies are up big-time, Distressed has been very volatile but has recently also turned up although from a much lower price point, and the broad “Other” segment (everything neither Trophy nor Distressed) has been languishing. And these three segments are just within the “institutional” market (the properties valued $2.5M+ that RCA tracks), not even including the smaller “mom & pop” properties that CoStar tracks.

I would also add (which you can see graphically in the commentary) that the main reason why the two price indices (Moody’s/REAL & CoStar) have not bounced up further this year is the role of distressed property sales in the overall market as tracked by those indices. Both Moody’s/REAL and CoStar are equal-weighted indices tracking broad markets. Trophy properties, while large on average, represent a small share of the number of transactions. On the other hand as far as I understand the Green Street index is not exactly a price index, and it is aimed at just REIT-held properties, and I believe it is value-weighted rather than equal-weighted, all of which would explain why/how it presents the larger apparent bounce (as well as the leading nature that Green Street is trying to reflect by focusing on deals in negotiation).

(Editor’s note: Thanks to both Chris and David for writing in with those clarifications.)

If you want to pore more deeply into the differences you can download the methodologies for CoStar, Moody’s/RCA and Green Street Advisors.

I’ve gone ahead and attempted to chart the three indexes against each other. CoStar and Moody’s both use December 2000 as the baseline for their indexes. (For CoStar, the data is its investment grade index.) Green Street Advisors, however, uses August 2007 as its base. I attempted to reindex it by creating a new index where December 2000 = 100 and then had it match the month-by-month percentage changes of the original index. The result is the chart above.

What does it tell us?

Most broadly, the indexes appear pretty similar on the way up and the way down, but have begun to show some more interesting divergences of late. In general, Moody’s and CoStar’s indexes show similar magnitudes of price appreciation during the industry’s good years. Green Street’s peak is a tad lower. The peaks on all three indexes come in 2007, but Green Street and CoStar measure the peak several months earlier than Moody’s does.

In the decline phase, Green Street’s index fell earlier and bottomed earlier. Its bottom is also not as for the CoStar or Moody’s indexes. Green Street’s index hit bottom all the way back in May 2009. In contrast, CoStar’s bottomed in February 2010 and Moody’s in August 2010. The difference stems from Green Street’s attempt to capture the prices at which commercial real estate transactions are currently being negotiated and put under contract rather than closed.

More remarkably, Green Street’s index shows commercial real estate prices rebounding much more dramatically than the other two indexes. According to Green Street, commercial real estate values have gained a lot of ground. CoStar and Moody’s indexes are off their bottoms, but seem to be bouncing along a trough.

So which index do you think is right?

Highlights:

  • The Moody’s index peaked at 1.919 in October 2007; CoStar’s peaked at 1.879 in August 2007; and Green Street’s peaked at 1.831 also in August 2007.
  • The low point in the Moody’s index came in August 2010 with a reading of 1.054. Peak-to-trough, Moody’s index fell 45.1 percent. The low point in the CoStar index came in February 2010 with a reading of 1.121 Peak-to-trough, CoStar’s index fell 40.3 percent. The low point in the Green Street index, in contrast, came much earlier with a reading of 1.129 in May 2009. Peak-to-trough, Green Street’s index fell 38.3 percent.
  • Currently, Moody’s index is still 41.9 percent below its peak. CoStar is 34.5 percent below its peak and Green Street’s is 20.5 percent below its peak.
  • Moody’s index is 5.7 percent above its low point. CoStar’s index is 9.7 percent above its low point. Green Street’s, meanwhile, is 28.8 percent above its low point.

Shuffling the Deck Overseas (Monday’s News & Notes)

It seems some of the biggest retail real estate stories these days are coming from overseas. In the latest development in Simon Property Group’s courtship of Capital Shopping Centres, U.K. regulators have given Simon a deadline of January 12 to come up with a “firm offer” for the British mall owners. So much for a restful holiday break for the execs at the nation’s largest mall REIT.

Meanwhile, things are also getting interesting again in the Centro saga. Centro is fielding bids for more than $13 billion worth of assets. According to the Sydney Morning Herald, interested buyers included Westfield, Lend Lease’s Australian Prime Property Fund, CFS Retail Trust, Queensland Investment Corp and the Singapore Government Investment Corp.

Lastly, Charter Hill REIT reached a deal to divest approximately 60 percent of its U.S. portfolio.

Here are some other notable news and notes from around the retail real estate world: